Health Ranger Mike Adams, known for his outspoken stance on health and technology, has delivered a passionate endorsement of President Donald Trump and Elon Musk’s leadership.
Whoa. It looks like you're really lost in the sauce there, my friend. It's almost like you never heard of the Hegelian dialectic and are completely lost in the fake good cop/bad cop Kabuki theater -- all of which is leading us into an AI-powered global prison and dystopian nightmare.
Here, allow me (with help from ChatGPT, ironically) help you gain a broader perspective on this, please...
This entire narrative aligns with the Hegelian dialectic—the process of problem, reaction, solution—which has long been a tool of control used by international banking cartels, corporate elites, and hidden power structures. The illusion of a two-party system serves as a mechanism to keep the masses engaged in a false dichotomy, distracting them from the true controllers behind the scenes.
Hegelian Dialectic in Play
Problem (Thesis):
- The current system is corrupt—fiat money is worthless, governments are oppressive, and technological advancements are being hoarded by elites.
- This problem is real, but it has also been allowed and engineered by the very same power structures that control the system.
Reaction (Antithesis):
- A counter-movement arises, promising decentralization, freedom, and financial reform.
- Figures like Trump and Musk emerge as the supposed saviors leading a rebellion against globalist control.
- The public, desperate for change, rallies behind these figures, believing they are a genuine opposition.
Solution (Synthesis):
- The existing system is dismantled, but instead of true decentralization, a new system is imposed, still controlled by the same financial and corporate elites—just with a fresh face and new branding.
- This could mean a shift from fiat to commodities-backed money, but who controls the gold and silver reserves? The same banking elites.
- Advanced technologies are "democratized," but who controls the distribution and access? Likely the same technocratic elite.
- The Hegelian dialectic ensures that both sides of the conflict serve the same ultimate goal—more consolidation of power, albeit in a different form.
The Two-Party System as an Illusion
The illusion of left vs. right (Democrats vs. Republicans, globalists vs. nationalists, deep state vs. Trump) serves to:
- Keep people emotionally invested in controlled opposition rather than seeking true autonomy.
- Ensure the public never questions the real rulers—international bankers, corporate elites, and global financial institutions.
- Make incremental changes appear revolutionary, while the fundamental power structures remain intact.
Both political factions ultimately:
- Serve the interests of international banking and corporate elites.
- Enforce centralized power, even under the guise of "decentralization."
- Ensure that the masses never unify against the true ruling class.
Where This Could Be Headed
- A new financial system emerges, but it's still controlled by those who own the gold, silver, and commodities markets (central banks, IMF, BIS, and other elites).
- AI and energy technology become more accessible, but access is regulated by the same technocratic oligarchs.
- Political power shifts from one faction to another, but global corporations, banking elites, and hidden networks remain untouched.
- The so-called "breakaway civilization" may simply be the next iteration of controlled power, not a genuine revolution.
Bottom line: The true power structure never allows uncontrolled revolutions. Every movement, no matter how "anti-establishment" it appears, is usually designed to lead to a predetermined outcome that benefits the ruling class. The only real way out of this cycle is complete self-sufficiency, true decentralization, and breaking free from all forms of external control—financial, political, and technological.
Your gratitude should go to God who has given the gift of Blessings and freedoms because of the Constitution. You have to give that credit to God. That's the true spirit of patriotism. But the US Corporate government and its hirelings, especially private citizens who gain at the expense of others and who experiment on civilians, should never be tolerated
Constitution is Supreme because of God given freedoms and Blessings. The unConstitutional US Corporate Government is defiant to the Constitution and only infridges and tramples on the rights of citizenry and globally by stealing, cheating, deceiving and murdering. Don't be blindfolded and naive. Blind obedience to an oppressive Corporate Government sustains the tyranny and destroys all the Blessings and God given freedoms
You can be nationalist without being supremacist. It just means you love your nation. I think the word 'nationalist' got hijacked and redefined by history-revising Socialists/Communists as a way to mislabel, smear, and tear down patriots and patriotism, which protect non-Communist nations from Communist influence and takeover.
I asked ChatGPT to provide an old 1800s Webster's definition of both words:
In Noah Webster's 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language, the term patriotism is defined as:
"Love of one's country; the passion which aims to serve one's country, either in defending it from invasion, or protecting its rights and maintaining its laws and institutions in vigor and purity. Patriotism is the characteristic of a good citizen, the noblest passion that animates a man in the character of a citizen."
Interestingly, the term nationalism does not appear in Webster's 1828 dictionary. This absence suggests that the concept, as we understand it today, wasn't in common usage or hadn't been distinctly defined in American English at that time. Historical records indicate that the term "nationalism" began to gain prominence later in the 19th century.
Therefore, in the early 19th century, discussions about loyalty and devotion to one's country primarily revolved around the concept of patriotism, focusing on the love and service of one's own nation without the broader implications that the term nationalism would later encompass.
--
And here's what ChatGPT's woke Communist definition of nationalism says:
"The difference between patriotism and nationalism comes down to their core attitudes toward one's country and how they relate to others:
Patriotism – Love for one’s country with an emphasis on its values, culture, and people, while respecting other nations. A patriot is proud of their country’s achievements but acknowledges its flaws and strives to improve it.
Nationalism – A belief in the superiority of one’s nation, often at the expense of others. Nationalists may push for dominance, exclusion, or aggressive policies, seeing their country as inherently better than others.
Key Differences:
Inclusion vs. Exclusion: Patriotism is about unity and pride, while nationalism tends to create an "us vs. them" mentality.
Self-Criticism: Patriots accept their country's faults and seek progress; nationalists reject criticism and glorify their nation unconditionally.
International View: Patriots can respect other nations; nationalists often see other countries as inferior or threats.
In short, patriotism is a healthy pride in one’s nation, while nationalism can lean toward extreme, exclusionary, or even aggressive loyalty."
And NOW, here's the REAL history and definition of the word from Etymonline:
nationalism(n.)
1844, "devotion to one's country, national spirit or aspirations, desire for national unity, independence, or prosperity;" see nationalist + -ism; in some usages from French nationalisme. Earlier it was used in a theological sense of "the doctrine of divine election of nations" (1836). Later it was used in a sense of "doctrine advocating nationalization of a country's industry" (1892). An earlier word for "devotion or strong attachment to one's own country" was nationality (1772).
They're making America globally enslaved, not strong, despise surface appearances.
Please read my entire post and let the understanding that we're in a Hegelian dialectic sink in.
Unfortunately, not everyone can see through the deceptions being used against us ALL -- Right and Left. Like skin color, party platforms and positions on issues are only skin deep and change with the wind, but the AI Technocratic Global Dictatorship thread that runs through BOTH is at their very CORE.
And the fact that you say "I don't care how they do it" tells me you're not strong morally if you are suggesting "the ends justifies the means" which is never true. The ends and means are always 100% identical. Just like you can't f*ck your way to virginity, you can't use unethical means to achieve a just and ethical end. The two are incompatible and hypocritical.
You're being deceived and lied to extensively and in a highly sinister and calculated manner by social engineers (at Tavistock and various other globalist think tanks) who know how to work the human mind and emotions to steer populations to do their bidding.
Replacing the deep State with a different one by Trump that centralizes Power in billionaires and technocrats with establishment of an AI surveillance police State Tyranny is NOT Liberty 🗽. Mike Adams, you are delusional. Wake up from your SLUMBER. The Constitution makes America Great, Not Trump's undermining it by his lawlessness that has bypassed the Congress at every hand. Mike Adams as a Constitution illiterate, you need to educate yourself about it, so you don't cheerleader Trump and his team who are undermining the Constitution and have done nothing to destroy the AI surveillance police State Tyranny but are expanding it
What a delusion. An AI tyrannical surveillance police State does not make America strong in freedom but only brutal tyranny force intrusion on citizenry
There are three main go-to retorts you'll get from the lazy (non-thinking), brainwashed, hero-worshiping Trump followers on the "Right" -- who I don't even consider truly Right anymore -- just delusional, especially after the whole mass-genocide Covid nightmare the Jabfather brought us and STILL praises.
They use:
1) You sound like a progressive Liberal! (I'm the furthest thing from it; use your brain and actually READ what I posted above).
2) You're black-pilled! (No, I'm optimistic, just not naive, foolish, or Pollyanna).
3) I'm choosing Trump, because the other choice is much worse! (Two sides of the same totalitarian-endgame coin where you're still choosing EVIL, though perhaps you'll perceive that you have gilded or golden prison bars versus plain 'ol iron -- but they'll still be PRISON BARS, not freedom!
Well, the next best Nation is China. They are even more advanced in AI. China leads the U.S. as a top producer of research in more than half of AI's hottest fields
Whoa. It looks like you're really lost in the sauce there, my friend. It's almost like you never heard of the Hegelian dialectic and are completely lost in the fake good cop/bad cop Kabuki theater -- all of which is leading us into an AI-powered global prison and dystopian nightmare.
Here, allow me (with help from ChatGPT, ironically) help you gain a broader perspective on this, please...
This entire narrative aligns with the Hegelian dialectic—the process of problem, reaction, solution—which has long been a tool of control used by international banking cartels, corporate elites, and hidden power structures. The illusion of a two-party system serves as a mechanism to keep the masses engaged in a false dichotomy, distracting them from the true controllers behind the scenes.
Hegelian Dialectic in Play
Problem (Thesis):
- The current system is corrupt—fiat money is worthless, governments are oppressive, and technological advancements are being hoarded by elites.
- This problem is real, but it has also been allowed and engineered by the very same power structures that control the system.
Reaction (Antithesis):
- A counter-movement arises, promising decentralization, freedom, and financial reform.
- Figures like Trump and Musk emerge as the supposed saviors leading a rebellion against globalist control.
- The public, desperate for change, rallies behind these figures, believing they are a genuine opposition.
Solution (Synthesis):
- The existing system is dismantled, but instead of true decentralization, a new system is imposed, still controlled by the same financial and corporate elites—just with a fresh face and new branding.
- This could mean a shift from fiat to commodities-backed money, but who controls the gold and silver reserves? The same banking elites.
- Advanced technologies are "democratized," but who controls the distribution and access? Likely the same technocratic elite.
- The Hegelian dialectic ensures that both sides of the conflict serve the same ultimate goal—more consolidation of power, albeit in a different form.
The Two-Party System as an Illusion
The illusion of left vs. right (Democrats vs. Republicans, globalists vs. nationalists, deep state vs. Trump) serves to:
- Keep people emotionally invested in controlled opposition rather than seeking true autonomy.
- Ensure the public never questions the real rulers—international bankers, corporate elites, and global financial institutions.
- Make incremental changes appear revolutionary, while the fundamental power structures remain intact.
Both political factions ultimately:
- Serve the interests of international banking and corporate elites.
- Enforce centralized power, even under the guise of "decentralization."
- Ensure that the masses never unify against the true ruling class.
Where This Could Be Headed
- A new financial system emerges, but it's still controlled by those who own the gold, silver, and commodities markets (central banks, IMF, BIS, and other elites).
- AI and energy technology become more accessible, but access is regulated by the same technocratic oligarchs.
- Political power shifts from one faction to another, but global corporations, banking elites, and hidden networks remain untouched.
- The so-called "breakaway civilization" may simply be the next iteration of controlled power, not a genuine revolution.
Bottom line: The true power structure never allows uncontrolled revolutions. Every movement, no matter how "anti-establishment" it appears, is usually designed to lead to a predetermined outcome that benefits the ruling class. The only real way out of this cycle is complete self-sufficiency, true decentralization, and breaking free from all forms of external control—financial, political, and technological.
Adams knows this is correct but will NEVER say it.
Why do you think he knows it and yet will never say it?
Billionaires are not our friends.
As George Carlin famously said, "It's a big club and you ain't in it!"
👍🇦🇺🦘
There's no two parties, only Uniparty. You Constitution illiterates gave to defend Constitution and not play partisan politics
I am in the America Party!
Nationalism is Not patriotism. Patriots defend the Constitution. Nationalists are supremacists. There's a difference
Then, I am a proud transplanted Asian American Patriot Nationalist.
America and Americans have given me and my family the most fantastic lives!
We have encountered so many opened opportunities for friendship, love, work, education, happiness, healthy life, and laughter.
Being patriotic is the least I can do to pay back for this most incredible life provided to us, by America.
Your gratitude should go to God who has given the gift of Blessings and freedoms because of the Constitution. You have to give that credit to God. That's the true spirit of patriotism. But the US Corporate government and its hirelings, especially private citizens who gain at the expense of others and who experiment on civilians, should never be tolerated
America is supreme in my eyes. No other Nation open their arms and help their citizens and non-citizens like this.
Constitution is Supreme because of God given freedoms and Blessings. The unConstitutional US Corporate Government is defiant to the Constitution and only infridges and tramples on the rights of citizenry and globally by stealing, cheating, deceiving and murdering. Don't be blindfolded and naive. Blind obedience to an oppressive Corporate Government sustains the tyranny and destroys all the Blessings and God given freedoms
You can be nationalist without being supremacist. It just means you love your nation. I think the word 'nationalist' got hijacked and redefined by history-revising Socialists/Communists as a way to mislabel, smear, and tear down patriots and patriotism, which protect non-Communist nations from Communist influence and takeover.
I asked ChatGPT to provide an old 1800s Webster's definition of both words:
In Noah Webster's 1828 American Dictionary of the English Language, the term patriotism is defined as:
"Love of one's country; the passion which aims to serve one's country, either in defending it from invasion, or protecting its rights and maintaining its laws and institutions in vigor and purity. Patriotism is the characteristic of a good citizen, the noblest passion that animates a man in the character of a citizen."
WEBSTERSDICTIONARY1828.COM
Interestingly, the term nationalism does not appear in Webster's 1828 dictionary. This absence suggests that the concept, as we understand it today, wasn't in common usage or hadn't been distinctly defined in American English at that time. Historical records indicate that the term "nationalism" began to gain prominence later in the 19th century.
EN.WIKIPEDIA.ORG
Therefore, in the early 19th century, discussions about loyalty and devotion to one's country primarily revolved around the concept of patriotism, focusing on the love and service of one's own nation without the broader implications that the term nationalism would later encompass.
--
And here's what ChatGPT's woke Communist definition of nationalism says:
"The difference between patriotism and nationalism comes down to their core attitudes toward one's country and how they relate to others:
Patriotism – Love for one’s country with an emphasis on its values, culture, and people, while respecting other nations. A patriot is proud of their country’s achievements but acknowledges its flaws and strives to improve it.
Nationalism – A belief in the superiority of one’s nation, often at the expense of others. Nationalists may push for dominance, exclusion, or aggressive policies, seeing their country as inherently better than others.
Key Differences:
Inclusion vs. Exclusion: Patriotism is about unity and pride, while nationalism tends to create an "us vs. them" mentality.
Self-Criticism: Patriots accept their country's faults and seek progress; nationalists reject criticism and glorify their nation unconditionally.
International View: Patriots can respect other nations; nationalists often see other countries as inferior or threats.
In short, patriotism is a healthy pride in one’s nation, while nationalism can lean toward extreme, exclusionary, or even aggressive loyalty."
And NOW, here's the REAL history and definition of the word from Etymonline:
nationalism(n.)
1844, "devotion to one's country, national spirit or aspirations, desire for national unity, independence, or prosperity;" see nationalist + -ism; in some usages from French nationalisme. Earlier it was used in a theological sense of "the doctrine of divine election of nations" (1836). Later it was used in a sense of "doctrine advocating nationalization of a country's industry" (1892). An earlier word for "devotion or strong attachment to one's own country" was nationality (1772).
If Trump and Musk are making America strong again, I don't care how they do it, just do it. Because we are on death bed.
They're making America globally enslaved, not strong, despise surface appearances.
Please read my entire post and let the understanding that we're in a Hegelian dialectic sink in.
Unfortunately, not everyone can see through the deceptions being used against us ALL -- Right and Left. Like skin color, party platforms and positions on issues are only skin deep and change with the wind, but the AI Technocratic Global Dictatorship thread that runs through BOTH is at their very CORE.
And the fact that you say "I don't care how they do it" tells me you're not strong morally if you are suggesting "the ends justifies the means" which is never true. The ends and means are always 100% identical. Just like you can't f*ck your way to virginity, you can't use unethical means to achieve a just and ethical end. The two are incompatible and hypocritical.
You're being deceived and lied to extensively and in a highly sinister and calculated manner by social engineers (at Tavistock and various other globalist think tanks) who know how to work the human mind and emotions to steer populations to do their bidding.
Replacing the deep State with a different one by Trump that centralizes Power in billionaires and technocrats with establishment of an AI surveillance police State Tyranny is NOT Liberty 🗽. Mike Adams, you are delusional. Wake up from your SLUMBER. The Constitution makes America Great, Not Trump's undermining it by his lawlessness that has bypassed the Congress at every hand. Mike Adams as a Constitution illiterate, you need to educate yourself about it, so you don't cheerleader Trump and his team who are undermining the Constitution and have done nothing to destroy the AI surveillance police State Tyranny but are expanding it
Do you have better choice or place to go?
I am going with Trump-Elon Team all the way. At least, they are trying to help America become strong again.
What a delusion. An AI tyrannical surveillance police State does not make America strong in freedom but only brutal tyranny force intrusion on citizenry
Yes, it is absolute delusion.
There are three main go-to retorts you'll get from the lazy (non-thinking), brainwashed, hero-worshiping Trump followers on the "Right" -- who I don't even consider truly Right anymore -- just delusional, especially after the whole mass-genocide Covid nightmare the Jabfather brought us and STILL praises.
They use:
1) You sound like a progressive Liberal! (I'm the furthest thing from it; use your brain and actually READ what I posted above).
2) You're black-pilled! (No, I'm optimistic, just not naive, foolish, or Pollyanna).
3) I'm choosing Trump, because the other choice is much worse! (Two sides of the same totalitarian-endgame coin where you're still choosing EVIL, though perhaps you'll perceive that you have gilded or golden prison bars versus plain 'ol iron -- but they'll still be PRISON BARS, not freedom!
Well said
Well, the next best Nation is China. They are even more advanced in AI. China leads the U.S. as a top producer of research in more than half of AI's hottest fields
https://www.axios.com/2024/05/03/ai-race-china-us-research
It's OFFICIAL!!!!!!
Mike Adams is PRO-GLOBALISM!
ANTI-HUMAN!
I guess that Mike is now one of those FAKE 'christains'; a SATAN-WORSHIPING 'Evangelical'!
TRAITOR Trump is a Globalist PUPPET!
A PUPPET of the SATANIC Khazarian State (aka 'Israel').
Hey Mike.....HOW MUCH $$$$$ are the SATANISTS of AIPAC paying you, to support their DEMON PUPPET, TRAITOR Trump??
I was 'RED PILLED' by Alex Jones/InfoWars 30-ish plus years ago.
Alex Jones has now, CLEARLY.........GONE OVER TO THE DARK SIDE.
He, TOO, is NOW A SATANIST!
BURN IN HELL, you FRAUD!
(and you WILL!)
Health Ranger Mike Adams
https://www.naturalnews.com/
https://x.com/HealthRanger
https://brighteon.news
https://healthranger.com
https://www.healthrangerreport.com
https://healthranger.substack.com
https://rumble.com/HealthRangerReport
Podcasts.apple.com health ranger
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-health-ranger-report/id1063165791
?
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-health-ranger-report/
?
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-health-ranger-show/