Health and Human Services Secretary RFK Jr. has proposed a nationwide push for wearable health-monitoring devices, claiming they will "empower" Americans. Critics, including health freedom advocates, warn that such devices could lead to unprecedented surveillance, data exploitation, and even forced medical interventions. Experts like Dr. Leonard Coldwell argue that constant biometric tracking may induce health anxiety and erode personal autonomy, raising concerns about government overreach in the name of public health.
The Wearable Surveillance Debate
In a recent episode of Decentralized TV, host Mike Adams and guest Dr. Leonard Coldwell dissected RFK Jr.’s push for widespread adoption of wearable health devices. Adams, donning a mock "compliance collar" for dramatic effect, questioned whether these devices truly empower individuals or serve as tools for centralized control.
"They’re basically enslaved," Dr. Coldwell asserted, emphasizing that constant monitoring disrupts mental and emotional well-being. "If you feel dependent on a wearable, you lose your sense of freedom—and freedom is the main ingredient for health."
The Weaponization of Health Data
Critics fear that biometric data collected from wearables—heart rate, blood sugar, hormone levels—could be weaponized. Coldwell warned:
Forced Medical Interventions: If a device flags abnormal vitals, authorities could mandate hospitalizations or vaccinations under the guise of public health.
Social Credit Systems: Data could be tied to financial access, travel, or even gun ownership, mirroring China’s surveillance state.
Psychological Harm: Over-reliance on tracking may fuel health anxiety, creating a "self-fulfilling prophecy of sickness."
Adams added that tech like spectroscopy could soon detect alcohol, drugs, or even "cancer markers," turning the body into "a witness against itself."
The AI and EMF Threat
Coldwell highlighted additional risks:
EMF Exposure: Bluetooth/Wi-Fi radiation may damage neurology, increasing risks of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s.
Remote Manipulation: Future devices could "shock users for non-compliance" or deliver drugs via embedded tech.AI-Driven Policing: Algorithms might flag "abnormal" behavior, triggering state intervention.
Natural Health vs. Technocracy
Both Adams and Coldwell urged a return to instinct-based health, citing traditional Chinese medicine (pulse/tongue analysis) as a decentralized alternative. "You don’t need a battery-operated collar to know your body," Adams quipped.
The Bottom Line
While RFK Jr. frames wearables as "empowerment," skeptics see a Trojan horse for control. As Coldwell put it: "The moment you let someone else monitor your biology, you’re no longer free."
For now, the battle lines are drawn—between those embracing technocratic "health solutions" and advocates of bodily autonomy. The question remains: Will Americans strap on their digital shackles, or will they "decentralize, not decarbonize" their lives?
For more updates, visit Naturalnews.com
Share this post